Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INSPIRATION
  • COMMUNITY
  • COMPETITIONS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here


USA Landscape Photographer of the Year 2016 open to entries NOW!

Thoughts please


faulknerstv 12 421 United Kingdom
13 Sep 2007 10:23PM
I do a lot of nature shots, plants birds etc,am torn between the AF 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6 ED VR D and the sigma 50-500, any guidance much appreciated, i use a D200

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

MikeRC Plus
11 3.6k United Kingdom
13 Sep 2007 10:42PM

Quote:sigma 50-500


Alot swear by it but it's damn heavy.....Mike
cameracat 12 8.6k 61 Norfolk Island
13 Sep 2007 10:52PM
AF 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6 ED VR D, The VR on this lens would make it usefull for hand held & low light shots.......Although the VR is not much use on a Tripod.........Smile

Looking at the focal ranges.....80 - 400 is pushing the boundaries.....But 50 - 500 is questionable..........Sad
scottishphototours 12 2.6k 2
13 Sep 2007 11:13PM
Do a search on www.dpreview.com - lots of info on there about both lenses.

In summary - the 80-400 is not regarded as being "tack" sharp (some even think its on the soft side..) and the 50-500 is nicknamed "the beast" because of its size and weight and the fact that it needs a tripod to tame it.

Bjorn Rosellett has a good site that rates the 80-400 and various other lenses (www.naturefotograf.com - I think - Google him) but I know he doesn't rate the Nikkor.

How about the 200-400 f2.8 Nikkor ? (wipes puddle of drool from chin and keyboard)

Andy.
cameracat 12 8.6k 61 Norfolk Island
14 Sep 2007 12:29AM

Quote:How about the 200-400 f2.8 Nikkor


Awesome Lens......Equally awesome price though...Sad
14 Sep 2007 12:44AM
Justification.... a smoker on 20 a day would pay for it in under two years if they quit the habit..I'm giving serious thought to both..!! Wink
Kevin.
Maddie 11 2.7k 2 United Kingdom
14 Sep 2007 12:58AM
i use the D200 withthe 50-500 lens handheld it can get heavy but then i am only small.
Coleslaw 11 13.4k 28 Wales
14 Sep 2007 8:17AM
Yes, 50-500 is heavy, but you will get used to it.
Me, Geoff Baker, Andrew (proberts) can't live without it....Smile
NikLG 11 1.7k England
14 Sep 2007 1:34PM
Sigma do a 100-300 2.8 as well ( or is it a 120-300... ), which would work with a doubler ( and the 1.4 ).

Nik
Chrism8 9 806 16 England
14 Sep 2007 2:06PM
I have a Sigma 100-300 F4, excellent bit of kit and have used with a 1.4 & 2x TC. image quality very good.

It's a bit heavy on it's own and gets some 3" longer with the TC, but it's manageable, or you can always use it with a monopod !

Chris
chase Plus
11 1.1k 246 England
14 Sep 2007 2:55PM
I use the Sigma 120-300,lovely lens.It copes with the 1.4xTC,takes a bit of getting used to.I was told the 2xTC does not work quite so well.
Now what a bout a 300mm Nikkor prime..oooooo yummy!
peter shilton 12 1.1k England
14 Sep 2007 3:51PM
Another 120-300 2.8 user here. A brilliant bit of kit, even with the 1.4.

A big beast though.

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.