Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here

Exclusive 25% off Affinity Photo: Professional photo editing with no subscription!

Feedback required on an image - comparison

If you'd like to join this group, either login or register with ePHOTOzine.

TanyaH Plus
15 1.3k 394 United Kingdom
24 Jul 2012 11:47AM
Right, now that I've finally figured out my a*se from my elbow and how to upload an image to a forum thread instead of a photo comment thread ... Grin ... I would be glad of some feedback on an image that I uploaded to the group's photos section. Basically - how could I have done it differently? Is the crop too severe? Could I have adjusted the tones/contrast better to produce a punchier/softer/more pleasing image.

Here's the original image:


And here's the B&W version that I did and uploaded:


Many thanks

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

mikehit 8 8.0k 13 United Kingdom
24 Jul 2012 12:11PM
The contrast between right and left is quite high to be a balanced image. I would try a reflector off to the left to soften some of the shadow - but maybe dodging in the left side a bit to lighten the shadow.
Focus is good. The top one looks a bit tight, or not tight enough. I know there are recommendations in portrait photography about cutting off at knees and elbows, I wonder if there is similar advice regards animal's ears?
The bottom image is better IMO, the space in the bottom right is 'empty' and distracting, and maybe a bit more space to the left as you seem to have cut off the corner of the eye and its eyebrow.
Gaucho 16 2.8k 2 United Kingdom
24 Jul 2012 12:19PM
I had a playaround, first in Lightroom then in Topaz B&W. I think I prefer the original to the crop. What do you think?


JackAllTog Plus
9 5.0k 58 United Kingdom
24 Jul 2012 12:21PM
I too had a go at recropping less tightly in Picassa, i was thinking of rule of thirds.

TanyaH Plus
15 1.3k 394 United Kingdom
24 Jul 2012 1:01PM
Oh wow!!

Mikehit - that's really useful feedback about the left hand side being unbalanced ... I hadn't even noticed that. I also agree about the space on the right being a bit distracting, but as I'd cropped quite close on the left hand side, I think I was trying to balance it up a bit, but obviously in the wrong way! As you say, if I'd allowed a bit extra space on the left, and cropped so that the edge of the eye wasn't cut off it would definitely make it better. (I'm still getting to grips with dodging and burning, but will definitely give it a go - I doubt he'd sit still long enough to use a reflector.)

Malcolm and Jack ... excellent mods, thank you! At first I thought that your mod, Malcom, was too harsh, but the more I look at it the more it appeals to me. I like the tighter crop of your mod Jack, and the way you've processed it makes him look the way a mouse would probably see him, right before that "Oh no, cat ...!!" moment Grin

I still think I prefer the cropped image (just cropped not quite so tightly, as Mike points out above) but thank you so much for having a go at redoing it. It's amazing how differently we all see things, and always educational to see how others would process an image.

User_Removed 8 4.6k 1 Scotland
24 Jul 2012 10:08PM
It all goes to show that there is more than one way to skin a cat! (groan)

I like Stuart's crop but, looking at the original, one of the most striking features is the colour of the cat's eyes.

I know it's not strictly mono - but I wonder how a mono conversion leaving the single colour in the eyes would work?
TanyaH Plus
15 1.3k 394 United Kingdom
25 Jul 2012 11:48AM
I did think about that LefForum, but was trying to be strictly 'mono' and wasn't sure if leaving a slight hint of colour in the eyes would pass muster or not! Smile Still, definitely another thing to try when I get round to reprocessing it.
26 Jul 2012 12:08AM
I'm not so sure about the focus. The OOF nose seems like a bit of a distraction to me?
TanyaH Plus
15 1.3k 394 United Kingdom
26 Jul 2012 10:22AM
I know what you mean about the nose being a distraction, but at an aperture of f/1.8 it was an either/or decision! Grin It's all a learning curve and I'm still discovering how to manipulate the 'exposure triangle' to suit the subject and getting the image I want Smile
27 Jul 2012 11:36AM
I know what you mean TanyaH. I like using my Nikkor 50mmF1.8 and this is something which happened me too. A wee bit wider on the aperture will reduce foreground blur.
TanyaH Plus
15 1.3k 394 United Kingdom
27 Jul 2012 2:04PM
I did try a wider aperture on a couple, but the light wasn't great and even with the ISO kicked up a bit it was still giving me quite low shutter speeds for hand holding (and lets just say I don't have a rock-steady hand holding technique at the best of times ... probably all the coffee!).

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.