Views: 235 (99 Unique) 
Vote 52
Award Shortlist   

Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INSPIRATION
  • COMMUNITY
  • COMPETITIONS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here


Comments


Zoundz 7 25 1 Ireland
6 Oct 2010 4:42PM
I think it's lovely! Smile

xx

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

soulofharmony 6 22 1 Norfolk Island
6 Oct 2010 4:43PM
what do i think.. its a piece of captured Art...

fantastic ! must be viewed larger >
DannyLenihan 8 213 19 England
6 Oct 2010 4:49PM
Two words. Wow.
jimmypaton 8 19 Scotland
6 Oct 2010 4:55PM
very good
jimmy
Mynett 8 142 6 United Kingdom
6 Oct 2010 4:58PM
just zooms out at you - a brilliant scene and capture

Linda
6 Oct 2010 5:01PM
Mmm, lovely.
Sean_Dillon 7 2 2 England
6 Oct 2010 5:08PM
That is stunning large. Wow.
John
mattw 12 5.2k 10 United Kingdom
6 Oct 2010 5:09PM
Very impressive work there. Fantastic light, and the composition works very well.

Just to nit pick, I wonder if the sky needs to be a tiny bit brighter?
The sky looks a tad darker than the reflection, which technically should not be the case, and to my eye the sky does feel a tad on the heavy side.

But plaese note, I am only suggesting a very small adjustment - and of course, if you are trying for the 'dark and moody' feel, then you have got it spot on.
TonyPrower 6 33 3 Iceland
6 Oct 2010 5:14PM
Thanks for your comments!
Matt, your nit picking is great, just what I wanted.
DannyLenihan 8 213 19 England
6 Oct 2010 5:18PM

Quote:Just to nit pick, I wonder if the sky needs to be a tiny bit brighter?
The sky looks a tad darker than the reflection, which technically should not be the case, and to my eye the sky does feel a tad on the heavy side.



Totally disagree with this comment. I think the blue in the sky is noticeably lighter, as it should be, and the clouds more intensely dark, as they should be. The intensity of the colours in the reflection is muted by the clarity of the water, hence why they appear darker in the sky. The reality is that they are blacker, not darker. The only really dark part is at the bottom edge, which I assumed to be vignetted slightly, in which case YES it is slightly heavy, but the bulk of the image is perfect IMHO.

Of course, it is just my opinion, and Matt's is just as valid, if not more so.
TonyPrower 6 33 3 Iceland
6 Oct 2010 5:33PM

Quote:Quote:Just to nit pick, I wonder if the sky needs to be a tiny bit brighter?
The sky looks a tad darker than the reflection, which technically should not be the case, and to my eye the sky does feel a tad on the heavy side.
Totally disagree with this comment. I think the blue in the sky is noticeably lighter, as it should be, and the clouds more intensely dark, as they should be. The intensity of the colours in the reflection is muted by the clarity of the water, hence why they appear darker in the sky. The reality is that they are blacker, not darker. The only really dark part is at the bottom edge, which I assumed to be vignetted slightly, in which case YES it is slightly heavy, but the bulk of the image is perfect IMHO.

Of course, it is just my opinion, and Matt's is just as valid, if not more so.


Well I agree with you both! There are parts of the sky, such as the blue which have the desirable balance, but I think the part Matt is referring to it the clouds directly above the sunlight rays. They are noticeably darker in the sky than in the reflection.
It has the look of hdr Tony, I've been using Enfuse a great little software package that looks natural but still gives the depth and can handle lots of images at once.

Dougie
6 Oct 2010 5:53PM
Beautiful shot.well done.
Fab shot you feel just like you where there Iam sorry to say have not looked
at your work before its outstanding well done
mike
rontear Plus
13 8 7 England
6 Oct 2010 6:11PM
Jokusarlon magic, Tony. Ron.
TonyPrower 6 33 3 Iceland
6 Oct 2010 7:11PM

Quote:It has the look of hdr Tony, I've been using Enfuse a great little software package that looks natural but still gives the depth and can handle lots of images at once.

Dougie



I am steering well clear of HDR, this is not HDR in the classic sense, but I do appreciate that it does have a slight hdr look. I couldn't get on with Enfuse!
Nigel_95 Plus
10 260 2 United Kingdom
6 Oct 2010 8:04PM
Stunning sky reflections and rays. If you don't mind a little more nit picking, the dark patches at the bottom of the frame look a tad too dark to me.

As with Matt and James, this is just my personal opinion.

Nigel
akhtarkhan 14 4 United Kingdom
6 Oct 2010 10:03PM
Fabulous work giving zoom affects.Good reflections and colours alround.
Akhtar
6 Oct 2010 10:18PM
I dont kow about been in the right place at the right time,your always there.Excilent..JT
mattw 12 5.2k 10 United Kingdom
7 Oct 2010 12:07AM

Quote:Totally disagree with this comment. I think the blue in the sky is noticeably lighter, as it should be, and the clouds more intensely dark, as they should be. The intensity of the colours in the reflection is muted by the clarity of the water, hence why they appear darker in the sky. The reality is that they are blacker, not darker. The only really dark part is at the bottom edge, which I assumed to be vignetted slightly, in which case YES it is slightly heavy, but the bulk of the image is perfect IMHO.


Interesting Observations Danny! You are of course right, although I stand by my first reaction in that the tones feel a tiny bit 'heavy' (If you know what I mean) . Of course, this may be just be exactly what the photographer intended.

Ultimately, Tony you may just have to print it out (large!) and see what you think.

I can tell you one thing - projected using a digital projector in a dark room - this will blow your socks off Grin
sherlob Plus
10 2.8k 126 United Kingdom
7 Oct 2010 12:50PM
A good result - I wish it were mine (Wink).

Just to pick uyp on the hdr point. HDR as a technique seems these days just to be reserved for the programmes such as photomatix and the hdr feature of photoshop. To me this image is still a hdr, as multiple exposures have been blended to give a final result that shows a dynamic range that was higher than that possible in a single exposure (in this case taken without filtration).

I also agree about the comments regarding the tones. MattW stresses that this is nit-picking, and I'd agree (although it is still worth stating given the op's request). My point is - how much do images need to represent reality in order still to work well? This image works for me. It speaks on an emotionally plane in addition to an aesthestic plane. Is the purpose of the image to be a record of what was there - or to communicate something else in addition (or both)? The tones may matter if this was strictly a matter of record, but to me they matter less when communicating feeling and emotion. To me a good landscape is not a mere record, but rather an image that communicates on an emotional level too.

Just an opinion...
7 Oct 2010 9:40PM
More than impressive! Would make a fine wall-poster. Beautiful!
Dave.
I do like the comments above, and as to the question 'how much do images need to represent reality in order still to work well?' I think the simple answer is that ultimately they don't need to at all.
This one does do the latter, being a landscape, and does it so well!
soulofharmony 6 22 1 Norfolk Island
8 Oct 2010 5:23PM
Returned .. to view again... and still love it as much... it's pure art in nature .

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.