well, 3 days now with no proper light (annoying as 3 GSW on feeders last 2 days) i have resorted to posting a few less-than-perfect Tiger Cub images.... more notes in a mo when i have uploaded variants but please see exif
notes for the less experienced -
(i mean not to insult, experienced folk look away now)
taken on a somewhat grey and overcast November day, ISO even at 1000 was borderline fast enough - any higher and the noise would really have started to become an issue so first element of compromise there
then trying to balance depth of field requirements vs. reciprocity - whilst it is possible in some situations to use a pod for wildlife it is not always a given, here i would have been lying flat out on the floor (in order to achieve subject eye-level) and balancing the camera/lens on the camera bag.
any smaller aperture / greater depth would have slowed shutter too much - and largest aperture would have further reduced depth (which would have mattered on some images more than others)
aha! you may say but pray tell why negative exposure compensation on a day so overcast that blown highlights would have been a miracle?
for any given ISO and aperture combination your camera will offer up the shutter speed for what it believe is your required exposure - so, if i shift my EC (here to - 1 1/3) then the camera gives a considerably faster shutter in order to deliver the darker than average image.
i have a personal preference to shoot marginally darker than most - but here, the settign would have been in order to gain a sharper (relative statement) image.
my own mentor John Wright taught me that, essentially, a dark image can be lightened (to some extent) whereas a blurred image is a blurred image.. similarly noise is better than blur and as such i should have perhaps also tried 1250 ISO
Pets and captive animals
Wildlife and nature
Alda, Derek_Fearn, Hermanus and 8 more