Amazon Music Unlimited Offer: 1-Month For FREE!
Comments

Hi again, this is another really attractive informal portrait. You have a warm-hearted, relaxed subject, doing what he enjoys. You have a good rapport with people, they are comfortable being photographed by you - that is invaluable.
As with previous portraits in the CG you have isolated the background for blurring and perhaps darkening, as with the previous uploads it jumps out! The hard cut-out edges, particularly to the beard... The sudden transition from sharp to total blur... The pink halo round the top of the turban...
We all preach - large aperture, shallow depth of field, isolate the subject against a soft background. But looking at you settings I would expect the background to be quite soft in the original file. Did you need to push it further? Is it your Camera Club telling members that they 'should do this'? Can you upload the original please? You can add it as a modification.
It would also help if you let us know what help and advice you are looking for in the Critique Gallery. I think my advice would be to look very carefully at each stage in processing and ask yourself if you are actually adding anything positive.
Moira
As with previous portraits in the CG you have isolated the background for blurring and perhaps darkening, as with the previous uploads it jumps out! The hard cut-out edges, particularly to the beard... The sudden transition from sharp to total blur... The pink halo round the top of the turban...
We all preach - large aperture, shallow depth of field, isolate the subject against a soft background. But looking at you settings I would expect the background to be quite soft in the original file. Did you need to push it further? Is it your Camera Club telling members that they 'should do this'? Can you upload the original please? You can add it as a modification.
It would also help if you let us know what help and advice you are looking for in the Critique Gallery. I think my advice would be to look very carefully at each stage in processing and ask yourself if you are actually adding anything positive.
Moira

dear mrs woolybill
i am confident in my portraiture approach, but not confident in my digital darkroom there are some members in our club who are masters of digital darkroom but i am not one of them, the background to this picture was a doorway and old pipes i suppose i could have left the slightly blurred back ground alone but i wanted it smoother and in so doing i have overdone the edges, any how i am thankful to you for pointing it out.
i am confident in my portraiture approach, but not confident in my digital darkroom there are some members in our club who are masters of digital darkroom but i am not one of them, the background to this picture was a doorway and old pipes i suppose i could have left the slightly blurred back ground alone but i wanted it smoother and in so doing i have overdone the edges, any how i am thankful to you for pointing it out.

Its a very nice shot; timing and eye contact all work well.
I did upload a mod with the edges a little cleaner and tweaked highlights down and contrast up.
Keep in mind, - the stronger the blur is, the harder it will be to avoid those fuzzy edges, try a less aggressive blur, and zoom in as I suggested previously. A compromise with a slight blur and clean edges might be a good idea.
Regards
Willie
I did upload a mod with the edges a little cleaner and tweaked highlights down and contrast up.
Keep in mind, - the stronger the blur is, the harder it will be to avoid those fuzzy edges, try a less aggressive blur, and zoom in as I suggested previously. A compromise with a slight blur and clean edges might be a good idea.
Regards
Willie

Thanks for your feedback.
Quote: i suppose i could have left the slightly blurred back ground alone...
Knowing when to stop, when to leave an image alone, becomes harder and harder as new technical possibilities present themselves. But this is about someone in their 'natural environment', to apply a wildlife concept to our own species. So long as there is differential focus giving emphasis on the subject, softening the background, I would leave well alone. Look to reduce the impact of any individual distractions intruding into the background, rather than creating an unnatural-looking effect for the whole.
I'd still love to see the original!
Quote: i suppose i could have left the slightly blurred back ground alone...
Knowing when to stop, when to leave an image alone, becomes harder and harder as new technical possibilities present themselves. But this is about someone in their 'natural environment', to apply a wildlife concept to our own species. So long as there is differential focus giving emphasis on the subject, softening the background, I would leave well alone. Look to reduce the impact of any individual distractions intruding into the background, rather than creating an unnatural-looking effect for the whole.
I'd still love to see the original!

A very good capture of this character, well timed and good focus.
Soft backgrounds do help the subject stand outbut there's also the use of information in the background to give details of the location or environment. Choosing one over the other or somewhere in betweeen is the creative choice.
Overprocessing though can have a negative effect and can detract from the appreciation of the subject even to the point of being a distraction which is the opposite effect you'd want. That's not saying 'don't do what you have here' of course, just don't go as far.
Considering backgrounds though, you could have shot this at full aperture. It's harder to get that lovely soft background on M43 asopposed to full frame cameras, so go as wide as you can. As far as I gather, that's a fine lens so you should still get a sharp subject and f/4 will provide sufficient depth of field to cover the subject.
Soft backgrounds do help the subject stand outbut there's also the use of information in the background to give details of the location or environment. Choosing one over the other or somewhere in betweeen is the creative choice.
Overprocessing though can have a negative effect and can detract from the appreciation of the subject even to the point of being a distraction which is the opposite effect you'd want. That's not saying 'don't do what you have here' of course, just don't go as far.
Considering backgrounds though, you could have shot this at full aperture. It's harder to get that lovely soft background on M43 asopposed to full frame cameras, so go as wide as you can. As far as I gather, that's a fine lens so you should still get a sharp subject and f/4 will provide sufficient depth of field to cover the subject.

So many club members seem to follow fashion: everything must be processed a lot, or else you haven't tried...
For street pictures, another line of thought is that you should shoot as you want it, and not alter things - you can still adjust levels, crop, dodge and burn in, but not adjust in the way this has been processed.
Mastering techniques is one thing - but there are some techniques that aren't that necessary...
For street pictures, another line of thought is that you should shoot as you want it, and not alter things - you can still adjust levels, crop, dodge and burn in, but not adjust in the way this has been processed.
Mastering techniques is one thing - but there are some techniques that aren't that necessary...