Comments
Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

No 2 for me,the first is a bit of a snapshot.
The second is a lot more creative and works a lot better for it.
ISO 800 ? Although todays digitals don`t show much noise its always best to keep the ISO as low as possible unless trying to be creative.
f5.6 @ 1/320th sec ???
How about Iso 200 f11 @1/125th ???
Your not trying to throw out the background so f11 being mid ground and 1/125th would be enough to freeze the shot
Saying that you`ve exposed well theres no noise and no movment, just passing on what i `ve bee taught.
Nice portpholio a collection of nice uncomplicated well taken images.
Hope this helps
Kim
The second is a lot more creative and works a lot better for it.
ISO 800 ? Although todays digitals don`t show much noise its always best to keep the ISO as low as possible unless trying to be creative.
f5.6 @ 1/320th sec ???
How about Iso 200 f11 @1/125th ???
Your not trying to throw out the background so f11 being mid ground and 1/125th would be enough to freeze the shot
Saying that you`ve exposed well theres no noise and no movment, just passing on what i `ve bee taught.
Nice portpholio a collection of nice uncomplicated well taken images.
Hope this helps
Kim

Quote:No 2 for me,the first is a bit of a snapshot.
The second is a lot more creative and works a lot better for it.
ISO 800 ? Although todays digitals don`t show much noise its always best to keep the ISO as low as possible unless trying to be creative.
f5.6 @ 1/320th sec ???
How about Iso 200 f11 @1/125th ???
Your not trying to throw out the background so f11 being mid ground and 1/125th would be enough to freeze the shot
Saying that you`ve exposed well theres no noise and no movment, just passing on what i `ve bee taught.
Nice portpholio a collection of nice uncomplicated well taken images.
Hope this helps
Kim
Thanks for looking and taking the time to comment, much appreciated.
I totally agree with you, I should have used a lower ISO……perhaps ISO 400 as 200 equates to 2 stops down on shutter speed which would have been mighty close to slight bur. In reality, I actually forget to change the ISO from my previous shot of Shangri-la Tiger.
I have marked your comment as constructive as your comments are valid and useful.
Btw, I just checked your PF and I really like it…….you also have a nice variety of shots.
Sushil