Back Modifications (1)
Views: 57 (24 Unique)  Award Shortlist   


By TimothyDMorton  
CYGNUS OLOR is Binomial Name for a MUTE SWAN and thus the title says it all.

Captured in RAW fixed the COLOUR BALANCE in Camera-in-the-RAW and then resized to 600 x 401 px, and lastly applied the UNSHARP MASK till it looked right to me.

Tags: Hamilton Canada Ontario Lake ontario Wildlife and nature Bayfront park CYGNUS OLOR MUTE SWAN DRINKING WATER

Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here

This photo is here for critique. Please only comment constructively and with suggestions on how to improve it.


debu 8 India
26 Apr 2013 1:10AM
Lovely image.

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

NDODS 7 5.1k 125 United Kingdom
26 Apr 2013 10:05AM
A very calming image Timothy

Nathan GrinGrinGrin
Trev_B 11 151 68 England
26 Apr 2013 1:31PM
Hi Timothy, I like the colours and the composition is ok, however the main body of the bird shows areas of being blown and generally over exposed. As you probably already know Swans and other white birds can be very difficult to photograph in bright sunlight, this has not been helped by using the multi-segment metering mode, try using spot or centre weighted metering. This could make the water appear dark which could be remedied in post production. Another option would be to use a negative EV value. Whatever method you use can be checked in camera using the highlight indicator when reviewing the shot after taking the image.

Diggeo 5 13 Greece
26 Apr 2013 4:08PM
Hallo Timothy,
I like this image. There are nice colors and reflections to make it interesting.
I'm not sure about those woods in the foreground. I would have removed at least the ones in the right side and the one in the left, which are out of focus, but quite bright to attract my view out of the main theme.
The swan is overexposed, but since you shoot in RAW, I think you can fix it. Just open again the RAW file and save another variation underexposured by 2 stops. Then you can blend them in photoshop.
All the best,
mrswoolybill Plus
11 1.2k 1870 United Kingdom
26 Apr 2013 9:37PM
You've shot in Raw, you should be able to retrieve a lot more detail from the swan which, as mentioned above, is overexposed. Try various possibilities - reduce exposure by a stop, maybe more; reduce brightness; see what the recovery slider does. Try these in combination.
I'll have a go at darkening highlights, without access to the Raw file the options are more limited...
I rather like the foreground reeds by the way, they give a sense of here/there. Depth, distance.
mrswoolybill Plus
11 1.2k 1870 United Kingdom
26 Apr 2013 9:43PM
I've uploaded a Mod. I darkened highlights by 50% (which I think is the second highest setting I've ever used!), tweaked in Levels and reduced brightness a bit. Took about 30 seconds. Even in the compressed jpeg there is a lot more detail available. There will be much more in the Raw file - there's no point in shooting in Raw if you don't use the data it gives you.
paulbroad 10 123 1229 United Kingdom
27 Apr 2013 7:27AM
A touich over exposed this time with feather detail loss. Those reed stems are a distraction again.


Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.