Views: 65 (46 Unique)  Award Shortlist   

hoverfly

By kjteng
F13 1/160sec ISO400
+ metz 15ms-1 flash

Tags: Hoverfly Close-up and macro Wildlife and nature Flash and lighting

Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INSPIRATION
  • COMMUNITY
  • COMPETITIONS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here


This photo is here for critique. Please only comment constructively and with suggestions on how to improve it.

Comments


20 Aug 2010 4:30PM
Very nice i would have voted but as you have selected critique wanted sadly i cannot .

The wings are slightly out of focus but otherwise another wonderful shot

Arabella

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

paulbroad 8 108 988 United Kingdom
20 Aug 2010 5:49PM
Not sure of Nikon synch speed- you say you used 1/400 sec - are you sure the flash would synch at that speed? Usually 1/200 or 1/250 unless you used the long burn setting on the gun.

A reasonable effort of the abundant Hoverfly. Are you really sure you should be using that converter. I know it gets closer but it reduces aperture by a stop and will drop the quality slightly. Your Nikon, plus 150 macro already gives you a 225 mm macro lens - and a converter will usually drop the quality a little.

This is good, but could be a bit crisper, and I know the 150mm Sigma is needle sharp. You are, indeed, very close, and depth will be a couple of mil.

Paul
Jestertheclown Plus
7 7.2k 249 England
20 Aug 2010 10:40PM
Sorry but all that technical stuff goes over my head!

However, I reckon you've got a pretty good image here. The fly's a bit central and I think it's just a little bit soft.
I've tweaked it using shadows/highlights, added a touch more contrast and sharpened it a fraction.
I'm using CS5
Hope it's OK.

Bren.
kjteng 7
21 Aug 2010 4:32AM
Thanks all for the comments.

Paul: That's an error. Shutter speed should be 1/160sec and 400 is the ISO setting.
Many of you have asked why I always keep the 1.4X TC which appear unnecessary at times. The reason: (i) I need the TC for tiny insect most of the time and (ii) I don't like to remove the lens/TC and expose the inner part of the camera in the jungle where it is quite humid.
paulbroad 8 108 988 United Kingdom
21 Aug 2010 9:23AM
I take your point on the TC. Obviously would not know this. You have a good camera and lens. If I were you, I would take some test frames with camera on a tripod and shoot a detailed subject with and without TC. Then compare the results.

I use a dedicated Sigma EX converter with my 150 at times with tiny subjects - but in better conditions I admit. The results are very good.

In your test, if you cannot tell the difference between the TC and none TC image, good. If you can, the D90/1500 Sigma combination might mean quality is better if you just enlarge the image.

Paul

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.