Views: 76 (33 Unique)  Award Shortlist   

Pebbles

By ameturephotographer
Just some pebbles

I would LOVE critique, or any tips you have for me.

Tags: General Close-up and macro Wildlife and nature

Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INSPIRATION
  • COMMUNITY
  • COMPETITIONS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here


This photo is here for critique. Please only comment constructively and with suggestions on how to improve it.

Comments


mrswoolybill Plus
9 839 1371 United Kingdom
23 Aug 2014 9:07AM
Hi Elise, welcome to ePHOTOzine and to the Critique Gallery, I see that you have just joined! I hope you will enjoy it here, it's a good community and you will find there are a lot of opportunities to learn. Explore the site, there are articles on technique but more importantly there is some great work to study, and a lot of very nice people who will pass on tips!

This is right up my street, a sort of natural abstract - real tactile objects, but the composition and the effect of the image depend on curves, shapes, not context. The light and colours are gorgeous, the exposure is spot on.

The site isn't picking up all your camera settings here. I'd like to know - did you decide on F5.6 or did the camera set to this for you? It's not a bad choice. The lower the F number, the larger the aperture, the shallower the depth of field. So you have some pebbles sharp, well defined, and then the background pebbles gently become softer.

I particularly like the way you have angled this, creating a pattern of rising diagonals. That's upbeat, dynamic, positive. But very subtly so.

But something to bear in mind when you get up close to a subject and use a low F number - the objects in front of the spot where you focus will drop out of focus much faster than those behind. You have half the depth of field in front compared with behind. So those two pebbles at the front suddenly become very soft. And because the one bottom left is large that presents a bit of a barrier to the eye. To see what I mean, try holding a finger up immediately in front of your nose and then try to look at the view beyond. The finger becomes a blurry annoyance. That's what you risk here.

Secondly you thought well for your crop, but I would go for a true square. This is not-quite-square which looks a bit flabby, undisciplined.

Both the above points can be sorted with a crop. I'll upload a square crop Modification in a few minutes, it will appear under the Modifications button below your upload, click on the thumbnail to view. I'll also get rid of that tiny brown stalk, which breaks the clean lines.

By the way I very much enjoy this sort of work, I know that there are people who will want something more - a starfish, a length of seaweed, a child's abandoned spade. That would create a different, more approachable image. It can be fun to do.
Moira

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

paulbroad 8 108 987 United Kingdom
23 Aug 2014 12:01PM
You need a focal point. Simply that. Which of those pebbles is the subject? You need something in there, suitably situated, to give a focal point.

Paul
pamelajean Plus
10 949 1781 United Kingdom
24 Aug 2014 3:14PM
Welcome to the Critique Gallery, Elise.

My kind of subject, too. I like all the different shapes, sizes, colours and textures.
Stones are especially attractive when wet, they come to life.
You have very nicely filled your frame with them, using a shallow depth of field.

When using such a shallow depth of field, try to choose just one or two of the most attractive stones to have within that focused area. Don't just get down and shoot, consider the important bit, that bit which the viewer's eye is going to first be drawn to. It may be the brightest, the most colourful or just the one you find most attractive.
I like the red ones on the left.
It's a little disappointing that there is a broken stone within your focused field.

If you just want to fill your frame with stones and have them all in focus, then you need to use a smaller aperture, which means a larger f-number, and greater depth of field. These stones would have provided you with an ideal subject to test out different apertures and to get your head around the difference they create.

Pamela.

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.