Back Modifications (2)
Views: 63 (39 Unique)  Award Shortlist   

Perfect catch!

By Sriharsha
A spider with a catch almost the double its size!!

Tags: Spider Wildlife and nature

Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INSPIRATION
  • COMMUNITY
  • COMPETITIONS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here


Enter ePHOTOzine's Prize Draw, with fab gifts for everyone! Click Here
This photo is here for critique. Please only comment constructively and with suggestions on how to improve it.

Comments


DonSchaeffer 11 15 United States
24 Jan 2013 3:48PM
High yuck factor in this. What a good catch though.

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

pamelajean Plus
10 969 1847 United Kingdom
24 Jan 2013 5:39PM
Hello, Sriharsha, and welcome to EPZ.
This is very well taken, just at the point of the spider's capture of the fly.
There is quite a bit of noise in your background, which could easily be removed in an editing programme.
I also feel that, if you wanted to tidy this up, the bits and pieces in the background could be completely removed, leaving just the leaf, spider and fly to take centre stage. Since you used flash, I wonder if you considered a lower ISO setting.
The fly looks to be in slightly better focus than the spider, and this may be due to your focus point being on the fly, and a large aperture which has given you a narrow depth of field. However, since the leaf behind the spider is in good focus, I suspect that the spider was moving at the time of shooting.
In my first modification, I removed the background, selectively sharpened the spider, and brightened the image. In my second, I rotated the image anti-clockwise to place your subjects on more of a diagonal.
Pamela.
25 Jan 2013 2:32AM
Hello Pamelajean,

Thanks for the informative comment.
In a hurry to have found a nice subject I did forget reducing the ISO setting. Otherwise, with flash and close subjects I'd generally go for an ISO setting of 100.
Your modifications are really great!
I till now was somehow apathetic towards any kind of photo editing jobs. Now I feel I have to give a serious look instead of an apathy driven by shear ignorance. To start off, what editing software did you use for this job?
paulbroad 9 117 1079 United Kingdom
25 Jan 2013 9:22AM
This is quite impressive at first sight but does need to be both sharper over all and with greater depth of field. I have no problem with flash for macro, it is often necessary. You have done quite well with a compact, but a DSLR with macro lens and an aperture of f16 minmum would be the best tool.

Unfortunately, that costs an arm and a leg. Compacts do a fantastic job, but they try to be jacks of all trades and thus master only a few. If you find you like sports, macro or certain other subjects and get really interested, a DSLR becomes almost mandatory.

Paul
paulbroad 9 117 1079 United Kingdom
25 Jan 2013 10:01AM
Photo editing. You do need to master the basics. Purists will argue, but we used a lot of tricks in the wet darkroom and, other than transparency film where you have to get it right in camera, almost every image will benefit from a little processing. Digital images, for example, are prone to slight un-sharpness due to the anti aliasing filter in front of the sensor. Thus a tiny bit of sharpening is almost mandatory, even with high end DSLR.

Paul
Focus_Man 6 481 631 United Kingdom
25 Jan 2013 10:28AM
Welcome Sriharsha with a very good initial upload. Yes, given the noise and of course general requirement in our hobby, you will need to get to grips with processing. I use Photoshop Elements 11, priced generally around 60 but earlier versions are very very cheap and good value for money, if that is major consideration, as there is very little offered by version 11 as opposed to say version 9. There are instruction books available and if this is your first effort at processing of any type, somethinl like "Photshop Elements ** for Dummies will be a good buy.

Anyway this is an excellent shot, I like it, but I would have used a smaller aperture to ensure a good DoF but here with your compact it looks good to me.

Frank
pamelajean Plus
10 969 1847 United Kingdom
25 Jan 2013 5:14PM
Hi, Sriharsha.
I use PaintshopPro, I find it extremely user friendly, and it does everything that I need it to do..
Pamela.
31 Jan 2013 7:49AM
Is there a way that I can download the modified photos in a high resolution?

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.