Back Versions (1)
Modifications (1)
Views: 210 (141 Unique) 
Vote 19
Award Shortlist   

Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INSPIRATION
  • COMMUNITY
  • COMPETITIONS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here


Enter ePHOTOzine's Prize Draw, with fab gifts for everyone! Click Here

Comments


Very creative, well done!
Paulo

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

miptog 11 3.5k 61 United Kingdom
1 May 2010 4:16PM
Ditto

Just get the hands out of frame next time Smile
W1ldside 6 29 United Kingdom
1 May 2010 4:29PM
Disagree ~ the hands give the shot balance and poise and therefore a different approach ~ Keep trying all those things that break the rules ~ Thats what sets us apart from the Norm....
Well done
kaybee 12 4.9k 25 Scotland
1 May 2010 4:46PM
Thanks for he comments and the modification folks.

Michael ..... out of curiousity - why 'no hands'?
canon_stu 13 140 4 England
1 May 2010 5:05PM
I prefer the image with hands,

Stu
miptog 11 3.5k 61 United Kingdom
1 May 2010 5:20PM

Quote:Michael ..... out of curiousity - why 'no hands'?


The bottom is the main focus point, the hands were not doing anything , so were distracting. Just my view.
Cor 7 Belgium
2 May 2010 9:03AM
V2 for me +++++
cor
RavenTepes 7 226 United States
3 May 2010 1:11PM
I agree...while granted, the rear is the main focus point, the hands do give the shot a level of balance and fluidity. I personally prefer the original, compared to the edit.
kaybee 12 4.9k 25 Scotland
3 May 2010 5:46PM
Thank you all.

Glad it isn't just me that prefers with the hands
walterec 13 4
4 May 2010 5:02PM
Hands in please; it is a bit too contrived without the hands
DRicherby 8 269 725 United Kingdom
8 May 2010 10:06PM
Hmm. I prefer it without the hands but I can't coherently explain why. The image seems somehow a bit too `wide' with them in. Or perhaps keep the hands in and leave a bit more empty space to the left and right?
kaybee 12 4.9k 25 Scotland
9 May 2010 7:46PM
Sorry? - you are going to have to think coherently and explain that to me.

How can it be too wide wih the hands but you would rather have more room at the sides? - that would make it even wider.
DRicherby 8 269 725 United Kingdom
9 May 2010 8:29PM
Adding space at the sides would make the image as a whole wider but it would mean that the subject wouldn't fill the whole of that width. Something that fills a very wide frame looks, itself, to be very wide; something that doesn't quite fill an even wider frame doesn't necessarily look quite so wide.

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.