Back Modifications (2)
Views: 85 (40 Unique)  Award Shortlist   

Roker Pier Panorama

By PaulSwinney    
This was a double take moment - I was on my way to photograph another event when The sun setting the pier off against the dark sky caught my eye.

Five photos stitched together in Photoshop

Tags: Lighthouse Pier Panorama Coast Black and white Landscape and travel

Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INSPIRATION
  • COMMUNITY
  • COMPETITIONS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here


USA Landscape Photographer of the Year 2016 open to entries NOW!
This photo is here for critique. Please only comment constructively and with suggestions on how to improve it.

Comments


alistairfarrugia 4 164 88 Malta
3 Jan 2013 8:16AM
I find very little to critique in this image, except for maybe the fact that the horizon is midway between the center and lower third of the image. Possibly would have added a bit more sky up top to put the horizon on a third.

A second comment is that maybe the image could be slightly brighter even though the dark tones work well in portraying the background weather. Either way half a stop of more exposure would probably help and give a bit more shadow detail to the lighthouse itself.

I think the lead-in works really well walking us through the picture as if we're really on that pier. Well done!!

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

paulbroad 9 114 1045 United Kingdom
3 Jan 2013 10:16AM
There is something wrong with the way the site is showing images. This looks very dark to me on the site, needing some brightening up as did the presented image to download. I downloaded to try adjustments in Photoshop and the download is much brighter and needs no work. My screen is calibrated, so I can only suspect the browser. I use 'Chrome', but don't normally see such a bad effect.

So, nice image, well seen.

Paul
banehawi Plus
12 1.4k 3492 Canada
3 Jan 2013 3:09PM
The image looks different here than when opened in Photoshop because its an untagged b&w image. Photoshop performs no colour management, hence the image is displayed brighter. The image needs to be tagged with sRGB for both the browser and Photoshop to show the same. So not the site Paul (Broad)

Having said that, its a well executed image Paul S. Id like some more information on how it was done, - vertical or horizontal panning, and why not use 18MM before I could add useful comments.


regards



Willie
Seamuscamp 7 2 10 United Kingdom
3 Jan 2013 6:39PM
Paul,

What a good eye you have! I've uploaded a version with adjusted contrast, to add drama to the long wall and more detail to lighthouse. Just a matter of personal taste.

Seamus
Thanks very much everybody.

Willie - I panned vertically and I zoomed to 70mm in order to get the composition that I wanted. I could taken one photo at 18mm and cropped but I wanted a higher resolution.

Seamus - I like the constrast adjustment. I held off on doing it because I wanted the contrast between the bright wall and the dark sky, but I think pulling back some of the detail in the brickwork adds to the photo. Thank you.

Paul - is this something I'm doing wrong when uploading?
Seamuscamp 7 2 10 United Kingdom
4 Jan 2013 12:33AM

Quote:There is something wrong with the way the site is showing images. This looks very dark to me on the site, needing some brightening up as did the presented image to download. I downloaded to try adjustments in Photoshop and the download is much brighter and needs no work. My screen is calibrated, so I can only suspect the browser. I use 'Chrome', but don't normally see such a bad effect.


Paul


Paul B
I've looked at this image in Chrome and compared it with Firefox. The Chrome image is definitely darker - more contrasty I think. (My screen is calibrated and my Firefox is pointed towards that profile; I don't know if Chrome can colour manage in this way).

Paul S
The more I look at this, the more I notice and the more I like - eg the catchlights on the near railings; the line of railings on the other side of the closed gates. These validate your multi-image route to greater detail. Did you use a tripod?

Seamus
banehawi Plus
12 1.4k 3492 Canada
4 Jan 2013 3:26AM
Seamus. Chrome performs no colour management. This is an UNTAGGED image, - so ONLY Firefox will handle it properly once you change the gfx_colour_management default setting from 2 to 1. This is why its important to tag ALL web images with sRGB, - even the mono shots.


Paul S, thanks for the information, - your done a very good job stitching. I will doenaload and take a closer look later.


Regards


Willie
Seamuscamp 7 2 10 United Kingdom
4 Jan 2013 10:13AM
Willie

Thanks for the info on Chrome. I had problems with Firefox itself until I found:

http://cameratico.com/guides/firefox-color-management/

Seamus
banehawi Plus
12 1.4k 3492 Canada
9 Jan 2013 4:45PM
Yep, thats the setting I mentioned Seamus. Firefox is the king.


W
banehawi Plus
12 1.4k 3492 Canada
9 Jan 2013 4:53PM
I came back after your information Paul, and took a close look. It is a good job overall. It needs sharpening, - its a little soft. Remember after you re-size and save, you need to open the new image, and apply some sharpening to account for compression. Ive done this in the mod.

Ive also checked the horizon, and its needs a .46 CW rotation, - but that may just be a factor of the stitching. Its not a lot over such a long horizon.


Unfortunately the mods are all limited in size, so it makes it difficult to really see any differences in whats been done, - however the mod has been rotated and sharpened.

I like your technique, - it works very well.



Regards


Willie
Thanks Willie. I always remove sharpening in the raw converter but then am a bit lazy in not sharpening them when uploading them. Good spot! I'll make sure to be less slack in the future...

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.