Back Modifications (1)
Views 53 Unique 33 Award Shortlist   
Regatta Offer: Save 15% With Code 15OFF

Comments


Spkr51 5 United States
20 Feb 2017 3:41PM
Beautiful image ***** SmileSmileSmileSmileSmile
dimalexa 4 5 Greece
20 Feb 2017 4:23PM
In my opinion, an underexposure of about -2/3 or -1 EV, would create more vivid color and stronger image. It's beautiful!
Dimitris
banehawi Plus
17 2.5k 4263 Canada
20 Feb 2017 5:02PM
Its a competent shot of the Rose.


The file and image size are very small, so a challenge to work with in post processing.

I did load a mod that has a warmer white balance, and the reds de saturated a little.

A darker image can indeed give a deeper colour as suggested, however doing so in very bright light can also result in a image that simply appears underexposued; so on a less bright day, it would work.



Regards


Willie
dudler Plus
18 1.7k 1877 England
20 Feb 2017 6:59PM
Willie's said it all. A competent shot, and I'm not sure what you want suggestions on...
paulbroad 14 131 1293 United Kingdom
21 Feb 2017 8:01AM
As above. A perfectly acceptable pictorial record. It does not need to be darker - I assume the rose is pink? To get more impact, then some directional lighting, preferably partly from the back.

Paul
22 Feb 2017 7:32PM
Hi
Many thanks for your Comments.
I took this picture in a very shiny day and the rose is really pink.
Banehawi said the file is too small to be modified. I can send the original if you want. Tell me your email.
Regards
Antonio
dudler Plus
18 1.7k 1877 England
25 Feb 2017 11:07AM
Antonio -

You can post larger files here: the maximum size that you can show is 2000 pixels along the long edge. It's a question of not resizing to a smaller file before you post.
26 Feb 2017 10:37PM
Thanks a lot dudler. Next time I'll do that.

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.