ADVERTISEMENT
Comments

Quote:Even tremblier.
Looking at both, the trees seem to be moving on the screen. That may be because I need new glasses...
Quote:The colour version seems to "lift & separate" just a little better for me.
Dougie

Thanks Dougie. I can't decide between them, b&w is colder, but I like blue sky being visible in the background right down to the base of the trees.

Quote:I can't decide between them, b&w is colder, but I like the sky being visible in the background right down to the base of the trees.
My sentiments exactly about so many B&W conversions I make. There's so often one thing lost for a different gain. The compensation is so many of your colour and B&W version work equally well.
Tim

A case of the same but different. Very different. I've fully wound up the mainspring of the clockwork brain cell and concluded that the old adage proves true - at least for me; comparisons are odious. The mono rendition hints of the Wild Woods; the colour suggests that Mole and Ratty may not be so very far away. Both are striking and will find a place in The Ericsamson Gallery.
Poop, poop! Mr Toad.
PS. I have happy childhood memories of lifting and separating Play-Doh. What was Playtex then? Or was it Play-Tecs ... presumably a cheap Meccano alternative? Hello Toys! 🥴🥴🥴
PPS. You may wish to buff up one of these - whip out the Brasso! 🏆
Poop, poop! Mr Toad.
PS. I have happy childhood memories of lifting and separating Play-Doh. What was Playtex then? Or was it Play-Tecs ... presumably a cheap Meccano alternative? Hello Toys! 🥴🥴🥴
PPS. You may wish to buff up one of these - whip out the Brasso! 🏆