Back Modifications (1)
Views: 51 (29 Unique)  Award Shortlist   

Young Canada Goose.

By paulbroad
What do you think about the daisy's? I've removed a few around the very edge but left the rest. The brightest spots, though, but natural?

Hand held.

Paul

Tags: Goose Baby Young Canada Gosling Wildlife and nature

Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INSPIRATION
  • COMMUNITY
  • COMPETITIONS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here


Exclusive 25% off Affinity Photo: Professional photo editing with no subscription!
This photo is here for critique. Please only comment constructively and with suggestions on how to improve it.

Comments


GeorgeP 11 29 17 United States
13 Jun 2018 4:00PM
Keep them . .the catch-light in the eye is sufficient to draw viewer attention to the subject and as you say, the flowers are natural.

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

banehawi Plus
14 1.8k 3894 Canada
13 Jun 2018 4:05PM
Completely natural to keep them. Nice detailed shot.
pablophotographer 6 952 335
14 Jun 2018 12:27AM
Hello Paul.

It is an accurate and sharp image of a young goose in the foreground.
Why are you concerned about the background?

You can keep them, erase them, blur them, or if you have a spare image of green grass you can use it and change the background.

I suspect that the choice to have them blurred as they are now is yours. Personally, should I have been given your equipment I would have worked with a greater aperture value and a higher ISO to get the flowers sharp. The goose is easily separated from the background because of its colour and the proportion of the main subject compared to the volume flowers occupy in the frame is far, far greater so to my opinion they could both coexist happily in the frame if they were both as sharp.

The anecdote regarding an elephant who hides itself behind the poppy comes to mind.
-''where? I can't see it''
-''see how well it's hiding?''

pablophotographer





tonyguitar 6 65 37 Canada
14 Jun 2018 1:33AM
The reason this is fine ' as is' is simply because this is what our eye sees when we look at this little one in person. [ very natural]. The face and beak detail help us to know more about these as we seldom get this close. TG
paulbroad 10 123 1250 United Kingdom
14 Jun 2018 8:39AM
Unfortunately, Pablo, the distance from the subject and available depth of field with that lens/converter combination would not have sharpened the daisies even at f22.

Paul
pablophotographer 6 952 335
14 Jun 2018 10:27PM
Thanks for clarifying Paul
dark_lord Plus
14 2.2k 540 England
15 Jun 2018 9:02PM
The daisies look perfectly fine as they are. As there's no original it's not possible to say if they were a distracton or not. I think if the daisies were not there at all the picture would look less appealing as they add to the commentary of 'spring'.

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.