Back Modifications (1)
Views: 116 (80 Unique) 
Vote 23
Award Shortlist   

Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INSPIRATION
  • COMMUNITY
  • COMPETITIONS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here


USA Landscape Photographer of the Year 2016 open to entries NOW!

Comments


Buffalo_Tom Plus
10 2.3k 9 Wales
22 May 2012 7:42AM
Excellent her eyes.." Pop".
Tom.

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

rontear Plus
13 8 7 England
22 May 2012 8:01AM
New experiments too, love the directness.
Ron.
Richsr Plus
9 90 223 England
22 May 2012 8:48AM
Like the eyes in this one
Regards Richard
puertouk 4 1.1k 17 United Kingdom
22 May 2012 11:05AM
Lovely looking model with a sultry look. I put the image into Photoshop camera raw, boosted contrast and shadows. I also made some adjustments with a little sharpening and masking. I went into PS, copied the background layer > layers panel > blending mode > multiply > opacity 50%. I used the dodge tool to remove the dark shadow around the collar bone. I added a new layer new layer and used the spot healing tool to remove slight blemishes, stray hairs. I then used the patch tool to remove some hair on her right arm to tidy it up a little. Hope you like my mod.
Stephen
22 May 2012 2:12PM
Very interesting mod, Stephen. I can see what you're aiming for. It's all a matter of personal taste, I'd never bother about the stray hair on the arm as it seems quite natural to me. I also find the work in reducing the shadow around the collar bone is quite noticable. It looks photo-shopped and again I think I'm more bothered by the un-natural-ness of the digital manipulation. I did actually remove a couple of spots prior to posting, but left the rest.
I think what it comes down to is personal preference, I'm happy to leave minor blemishes alone, but I know that some aspects of publishing, for instance let's mention High Fashion magazines, want everything to be perfect.
As a consequence my skills in photoshop are quite poor, and I suspect you'd run rings around me in this respect!
cheers
steve
banehawi Plus
12 1.4k 3496 Canada
22 May 2012 6:22PM
Nice pose, comes off well.


W
puertouk 4 1.1k 17 United Kingdom
23 May 2012 8:37AM
Hi Steve, as you say, it's all down to personal taste. I noticed that I had gone a little too far on the collar bone area and wanted to leave a slight shadow to give it some depth, but I had to rush out, so that's my fault. Yes, you can go too far with post production work, that's why the industry watchdog has put there foot down with a lot of the photography world. Changing images to an extent, the models were perfect. It's a billion business beauty and all it's related products. The normal person on the street getting fooled by Photoshop! Models with perfect figures (liquify tool) perfect skin (spot healing brush) beautiful skin tones (brush tool) and it goes on. Where do you draw the line on post production work? They say beauty is skin deep, not in Photoshop it isn't! I've seen images of really ugly people turned into very attractive people. It's amazing what can be done in Photoshop. Some people are just pure artiststic geniuses.
Stephen

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.