Save up to £360 on selected ZEISS lenses!
Comments
Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.
They don't come any better.
David
David
superb
It does look to flat for me to be honest great pose and good to see the fish but the light is poor, most of your work deserves the highly commended but I do question this one, when I see a lot of excellent images on here that never get a look in, I know that is nothing to do with you, but I do sometimes wonder why
Agree V2 much better
Thanks all.
Thanks Tom for the UA, appreciated. In fact I was going to delete the image, but as someone had awarded their personal award that would be a touch rude.
Why upload the one without full processing, well I wanted to prove that it was as I thought flat, but I am sure if V2 was there by itself it would have been described as over-staurated. I think it proves that comparison is more powerful than viewing a single image in seeting a baseline.
To see how the images really look on the RAW file these early ones are completely flat straight out of the camera due to the atmospherics that were still around. It was very misty and poor light. In days of print though would I have just binned this because the initial print would have been poor? Probably, so digital gives us more flexibility to draw the image out, something which quite often I am too lazy to fully explore. Hence why I have so many never seen images on my hard drive. Maybe one day I'll fully process them and find some hidden gems.
Thanks Tom for the UA, appreciated. In fact I was going to delete the image, but as someone had awarded their personal award that would be a touch rude.
Why upload the one without full processing, well I wanted to prove that it was as I thought flat, but I am sure if V2 was there by itself it would have been described as over-staurated. I think it proves that comparison is more powerful than viewing a single image in seeting a baseline.
To see how the images really look on the RAW file these early ones are completely flat straight out of the camera due to the atmospherics that were still around. It was very misty and poor light. In days of print though would I have just binned this because the initial print would have been poor? Probably, so digital gives us more flexibility to draw the image out, something which quite often I am too lazy to fully explore. Hence why I have so many never seen images on my hard drive. Maybe one day I'll fully process them and find some hidden gems.
Nice one Cheryl! V2 for me though!
Josh
Josh
