Take Control of Your Digital Life with Mylio Photos: Try It; It’s FREE

In search of the perfect camera bag


Time for an update: I still use film, though. Not vast quantities, but I have a darkroom, and I'm not afraid to use it.

I enjoy every image I take: I hope you'll enjoy looking at them.
...Read More

In search of the perfect camera bag

16 Aug 2020 8:39AM   Views : 693 Unique : 464


Phil Taylor reckons there’s no such thing as the ideal camera bag, and his favourite isn’t even a bag. And it's always a pleasure to be able to produce a blog full of somebody ele's opinions - not to mention Phil's telling reprotage pictures - which, of course, provide him with a reason for wanting a really functional cmaera bag.
Way back in the post war era, all the way into the 80s, no camera was complete without an ‘ever ready case.’ Pretty much always in leather, nobody bothered about a meat free option back them, they ranged from the beautifully engineered ones on the twin lens Rollei, with built in springs that tucked the cover out of the way, to the lovely fit like a glove saddlery of the Pentax Spotmatic version. Back then 35mm SLRs were fitted by default with a 50mm standard lens, which many photographers never moved on from. The Japanese made it an art form, even designing cases with long noses for short tele lenses, but they never explained what you did with the other lens you removed. Behind the Iron Curtain things were different, the Krasnogork Mechanical Factory’s Zenith came in a famously malodorous case that seemed to have been styled by the designers of the Kalashnikov, and Dresden’s Prakticas were little better.


By the 1980s manufacturers such as Olympus were advertising their cameras in the hands of famous photographers such as Terry Fincher, David Bailey and Terence Donovan totally naked; and you can’t really see Don McCullin ever having kept a camera in any kind of case Cameras were now being marketed as durable enough to look after themselves without a leather jacket in any weather. I can vouch for that, as when shooting a 24hr, 24 locations documentary, at 4:00 AM my Pentax MY fully manual camera packed in during a downpour. The film refused to advance, being wet, and glued to the guide rails. The film was ripped out, and the lens removed, the body was gaffer taped to the heater vents in the Mini Metro, and the camera left to warm up, as water poured from the motor drive socket. Try doing that with modern kit!


Of course, as part of a system, you would start to accumulate a collection of lenses, a flashgun, cable release and several lurid coloured Cokin filters collected magpie fashion. Camera shops started to see the upselling potential, and before long the market was flooded by soft nylon cases with way too much padding, little weatherproofing, and so light that they were forever slipping off your shoulder. Then there were the inevitable zips, and loads of Velcro that meant getting anything out of the bag was accompanied by a loud RRRRIIIIPPP. Of course, the ‘pro’ alternative was the aluminium case, lots of little compartments that you made yourself with pick and pluck foam. I once lugged one around whilst photographing a bike race. By the end of the day, I was exhausted, and my jeans had a huge black patch from wearing away the thin aluminium skin. As storage at home they were perfect, and if you worked in a studio setting, they were great to leave open on the studio floor. For wedding and portrait photographers they were an instant stool that you could sit brides on. Few of them were as robust as they looked, as I found out when I used one laid flat to add a few inches to a lady in a portrait group; after a few seconds I could hear the sound of splintering wood, and feared the worst for the medium format system inside, then it got worse, as my assistant for whom English was a second language exclaimed, “I think you had better get off, you are rather ample.”


Then along came the archetypal British camera bag of the 80s, the Billingham. My early version arrived on the week of the Chernobyl disaster, and got christened in a day’s fell walking in torrential rain, laced with radiation. It was so bad, the bag was never opened, but everything was bone dry, having been protected by the canvas and rubberised layers, like a Barbour with a shoulder strap. Watch any news footage of the period where a Conservative politician, union leader etc. is being pursued down a street by a pack of journalists, and you’ll see a Billingham bag with the hand strap dangling down. They were not without their faults, for modern large lenses the original inserts are too small, the webbing shoulder straps shred into tatters, and that signature hand strap with tooled leather handle always catches on the gear lever/handbrake if you have had it on the passenger seat, when you try to leave the car with it. Then, if left loose, the handle made a rhythmic thump on the underside of the case, announcing your presence. They last for ever, and it’s a badge of honour to still have an ancient one with battle scars. I still have mine, and it’s even been used into the digital era, with a netbook (remember them) tucked into the side pocket. Of course, you can’t wash them, so they resemble a pair of Hells Angels’ originals over the years, after 10 years of restaurant review photography, a chef took one look at the stains on mine, and reckoned he could make a stock with it.


I’ve never really understood the trend for backpacks, although I own a large (everything including the kitchen sink) Lowepro one. Although with my specific one, you are supposed to be able to put on the waist belt, remove the shoulder straps, and lower it down by your waist, and change lenses, it doesn’t work for me. Then. With many, there’s the risk of simply being robbed by unzipping the back on many models, or forgetting to zip up- I’ve seen a cascade of L glass fall onto concrete that way. Canon CPS in early digital days made a perfect backpack, with laptop storage, screen sunshade, where at least they had listened to the target audience. Of course, ultimately, in most situations, you have to stop what you are doing, unless working from a fixed location, take it off and put it down on probably damp, muddy ground I’m afraid that most manufacturers seem to be fulfilling a need in some ‘athleisure’ market, where there’s a need to access stuff from the side or the top, store wet kagoules, a water bottle and probably space for a yoga mat, when you fancy a bit of hilltop exercise silhouetted against the sunset on a mountain top for Instagram.


Of course, for me, finding the perfect camera bag has been like finding the Holy Grail, with as much success as Monty Python’s knights. There’s no ideal camera bag, and so much depends on genre, location and physical fitness. There’s the solid plastic case that stays at home/in the studio/car boot, the lightweight day bag, the carry everything shoulder bag, the rucksack, and the novel bag that somebody innovative has designed for a need that doesn’t exist. Bag manufacturers like to aim their products at a market that they reckon appeals, the outdoor type who roams the hills after wildlife, which might make the bird on a twig Ephotozine crew happy, but doesn’t work well outside that.

The phrase ‘going digital’ won’t mean much to any younger photographers, but nearly 20 years ago, it required a major rethink. Suddenly everything got big and heavy, there was a need to carry stuff- cables, chargers, memory cards, batteries, and on many jobs, a laptop. Billingham stuff had suddenly got very expensive compared to the competition. Few cases had the space to take modern larger lenses, then there was the weight problem, a backpack has saved many a pro photographers career from ending, the late Sally Soames reckoned that heavy equipment caused much of the ill health that dogged her later years. For me, an interim solution was a Tenba copy of the classic Domke bag, space for 4 fat lenses, 2 bodies, side pockets for all the electrical gubbins, and two large end pockets for the flashguns, one pocket even had a cutout for the aerial of your mobile phone to peep out (stop laughing at the back, at one time they really did have walkie talkie aerials). All the weight however was borne by one shoulder, and you would be constantly shifting it from side to side. One day, after a walk across town, shifting my heavy Windows 2000 14” laptop and bag from shoulder to shoulder, something had to give.


I think I finally found the Holy Grail of camera bags, Lowepro had looked at what photographers in a particular field needed, and came up with the perfect reportage camera bag. It was the Tony Blair era, so they must have held a focus group. It might have been aimed at reportage, but I reckon it’s ideal for anyone carrying two bodies and three or four fat lenses, a couple flashes and a laptop, the Lowepro Stealth Reporter D650 AW. Why do I love it?

1. Waterproof covers, rarely needed, if as, I recommend for all bags, you Scotchgard it;
2. The lenses are stored vertically, so after opening the top ‘slash’ zip you can pull them out of a pretty much sealed case in light rain, and drop them back in;
3. It takes the Street and Field utility belt, at last, the weight is now distributed between waist and shoulder, and if you really must carry more, you can add lens pouches;
4. It has a sleeve to store a laptop- irrelevant nowadays, but useful back in the day (You won’t believe it, but you couldn’t get much in the way of Wi-Fi outside of BT Openzone and McDonalds, and you needed a paid for account too!);
5. Best of all, you could walk and work from it, at an event, in a crowd, it could stay on your body, and you can work out of it without putting it down.
Lowepro even listened to users, and added even more waterproofing, kept all the cable and widget pockets, made it single clip opening, but spoiled it a bit by adding a bright orange logo rather than the grey embroidered one. Maybe they have done the same for those who need a yoga mat and incense burner compartment too, it’s not my market.

Unfortunately, Lowepro have discontinued the Reporter series, and don’t seem to take on board the need for its return in a modern form, OK ditch the laptop in a shoulder bag, but please give us a shoulder saving belt.


So, where does that leave us in the 2020s? Camera manufacturers are telling us that cameras are showerproof, have tougher casings, are dust sealed etc. I can vouch for their toughness, having dropped a Canon 7D2 onto a cow shed floor, dented the mode dial, and 8 months on it’s still going, and dropped a 5D Mk3 onto tarmac last month, the only damage being a tiny chip in the paint on the battery grip. Water resistance is a moot point, but then, 13 hours of Storm Ciara unprotected was pushing it, and the £400 mainboard repair was unwelcome. There’s a Think Tank waterproof cover in the car now, as I do a lot of wet weather reportage, it’s inconvenient, but it’s better than weeks waiting for a camera to be repaired.

Is there a place for a form of the ever-ready case to return? There might be a case (if you’ll excuse the pun) for those neoprene rubber camera sleeves, especially if you work with two bodies constantly rubbing against each other. Personally, I think I’ll spare the cameras having to wear something that resembles rubber bondage gear with cutouts for the focus point nipple. The coloured versions tend to have a bit of a Fisher Price look to them. The camouflage sleeves, I reckon do have a purpose, as they protect the paint on those expensive white lenses, but I understand a touch up paint is available in the Canon catalogue.

There’s the modern trend for high quality compacts from the likes of Fuji, and the ‘nifty fifty trend, so maybe the ‘never ready case’ might be due a comeback.


So, whilst I wait for Lowepro to reinvent the Holy Grail for reportage work again, what am I using? Well, back in the early 2000s, before me and lenses got fat, I started doing a bit more reportage. I bought myself a cheap, green, canvas fishing jacket, one camera and lens round my neck, a small 70 to 300 in a big pocket, a wide angle in another, a flashgun, mobile, wallet, AAs and film distributed in all the smaller pockets. The advantages were that like the Lowepro Stealth, you could walk and change lenses, it stayed strapped to your body, and best of all, the weight is distributed. The drawback is that it’s not waterproof, but that’s easily solved by putting a jacket over the top. In reality, most outdoor reportage doesn’t need more than two lenses, with plenty of experience I reckon I can envisage what’s needed in advance on a job- but the 70 to 200mm f2.8 won’t fit. But, those pockets can be painful, I remember being on the floor at an open air concert with the Halle orchestra, having crawled on the floor to look up at the horn section, just as they opened up the microphones, just in time for the desk to ring my mobile- ever tried finding a phone in 10 pockets simultaneously?

So, if I hadn’t been confined to the house by NHS Track and Trace, my ready to go bag would be by the door, as discussed in the Method, Method, but the tripod, Think Tank waterproof, and now tattered jacket simply lie in the boot of the car instead of a yoga mat.

The future, well maybe we are going backwards to cameras the size of the Olympus OM1, mirrorless APS C certainly seems to be going that way.

Anyone got any thoughts on what my next Holy Grail camera bag should be?


Recent blogs by dudler

Focus scales

If you’ve been taking pictures since before autofocus arrived, you’ll be very familiar with focus scales – they are one of the primary controls on an old-school camera, and just one more of the things that you really needed to get right. With autof...

Posted: 27 Dec 2022 7:01AM

Porcelain processing

People commented on the look in my last post and it seems like a good idea to share the secrets for Christmas. I learned the technique several years ago: a model’s boyfriend told me about it, and a website that described it in detail: I tried it, l...

Posted: 23 Dec 2022 10:47AM

You develop your own films don’t you?

If you have your own darkroom, or if you use film cameras regularly, there are always a few people who mention the attic. As in ‘Grandpa’s cameras are in the attic. I don’t even know if they have film in them!’ This leads me to ask if I can have a l...

Posted: 16 Aug 2022 11:17AM

Choose your pond

There’s an old saying about being a big fish and a little pond. Do you want to be the most important person in a small organisation, or are you content being a relatively small cog in a big machine? It’s the same in photography. With relatively mo...

Posted: 3 Jun 2022 2:25PM

Graduated filters

This is for Hannah, and anyone else who has come across the casual way that a lot of togs talk about one or two types of filter that landscaper photographers use a lot: graduated filters and neutral density filters. A graduated filter is one that i...

Posted: 25 Apr 2022 12:18PM


dudler Avatar
dudler Plus
20 2.1k 2048 England
16 Aug 2020 9:10AM
Phil's a man with strong views - I'd particularly like to hear from people with completely contrary ideas...
PaulCox Avatar
16 Aug 2020 10:13AM
Wow! Where do you start on this one, my first camera case in1966 was my old children’s suitcase about 16”x12”X5” because I couldn’t afford anything else, because at the time I went to Motor Race meeting it became covered with the stickers you acquired at these events, it contained a Praktica Nova 1b with 50mm f2.8 tessa Lens I think and a 400mm f6.3 Soligor in it, all rapped in foam, to stop them rattling around, and it is still in the loft today unused with the JPS and Yardley McLaren plus many other motor racing stickers still on it, After that I have tried so many Bags Aluminium Cases Backpacks etc that I could start a secondhand shop for Camera bags, but I have never owned the holy grail the Billingham, but do have some Lowepro bags, and it’s good to now that they are considered highly, please let us know when you find your Holy Grail bag, as it would probably suit most of us. Paul.
dudler Avatar
dudler Plus
20 2.1k 2048 England
16 Aug 2020 10:36AM
I wrote about my own choice of bags a few weeks ago: my favourites are a Billingham Hadley (which holds 6 prime lenses, plus a body with lens, filters, batteries and cards: the advantage of a mirrorless system!) and a Tenba P500, long out of production, which holds my Contax outfit (again, loads of primes, plus film in the zip pocket in the top).

The thing with Billingham is that the after-sales service is superlative: when I needed a new strap for the front pockets, a call to the factory and a modest charge brought the part I needed in the next post. And, of course, they are incredibly durable.
altitude50 Avatar
altitude50 19 23.9k United Kingdom
16 Aug 2020 11:55AM
I could go on & on about camera bags. I have had a lot. The one that suits me at the moment is the Tamrac Evolution (quite big) but I don't walk very far with it, it goes in the boot of the car when I am out. (I am a fair weather photographer.) Well made with good materials and excellent sealed zips.
My Infrared Panasonic GX7 and lenses go out in a black Billingham 335 bought for £25 with a Minolta AF SLR & two lenses in a charity shop. Sold the camera & lenses for £25 so it cost me £0.
dark_lord Avatar
dark_lord Plus
19 3.0k 836 England
16 Aug 2020 12:10PM
I remember the very bulky ERC that came with my Praktica.
It wasn't long nefore it gt replaced with a 'gadget bag' which was little more than a holdall in retrospect but it kept the few bits and piees I had together.
Once starting work and getting more gear I had a Fotima bag which served its purpose well.
It got replaced with a Billingham bag which I still have, bought in September 1991.
I now have three Lowepro backpacks, all of which store equipment and are chosen depending on the requirements of a particular shoot.
You won't get a 500 mm f/4 into a classic Billingham.
JuBarney Avatar
JuBarney Plus
12 36 7 United Kingdom
16 Aug 2020 1:28PM
Well, I think you should aim for a bag smaller than the pick up truck, although that would probably hold ALL your camera gear!

Love the first shot of the policeman with the masked chap, and the POV of the plougher.
GGAB Avatar
GGAB 7 31 1 United States
16 Aug 2020 3:54PM
I started my photography journey in 2014 so I don't have the history that most of you have.
I started with a Canon bag, followed by small backpack as I expanded my kit.
I currently use a 46L Osprey Backpack with a "large camera cube" insert by Peak Design.
I bought a clearance Osprey Porter 46 Travel Backpack ; Convertible on ebay for $57.00 to put the Large Camera Cube into.
The internal dimensions of the Osprey match the external dimensions of the camera cube perfectly.
It carries multiple cameras, large lenses, accessories and is adjustable using the inserts that come with the Camera Cube.
The Straps on the Osprey allow me to secure my travel tripod as well.
The total cost was much less than what Peak Design wanted for their complete solution and is serving me very well.
When I do not need the large lenses and multiple cameras, I still have the smaller backpack as well as the Canon Bag.
altitude50 Avatar
altitude50 19 23.9k United Kingdom
16 Aug 2020 4:38PM
Oh! I almost forgot. A few years ago I answered a survey by a new to the market camera bag manufacturer. (I won't say the name.) I won one of their bags, it was very well made out of quality materials and had a innovative feature. I couldn't get on with it at all so I sold it.
I have also had a couple of sling bags which I didn't like. At the moment because I am self isolating, if I do take the car out, (about 20 minutes) I take one camera, one lens for local interest and the bags are at home......
pablophotographer Avatar
pablophotographer 12 2.2k 450
16 Aug 2020 11:08PM
Does anyone remember the KATA bags catalogue with shots from one specific continent? Two men on a scooter, the driver and the assistant who carries a long stepladder with their heads between the steps, the biker who delivers a under-desk fridge which holds with one hand, while the other steers the bike, or the two men on a motorcycle delivering a huge mirror with no safety wrap around it.

Did anyone mention the cult adidas sports bag of the 70's that is not bigger that two shoe boxes?? It certainly fits an micro four thirds and a few lenses.. Or your whole selection of Pentax Q lenses and two bodies? And certainly fits a telephoto and two Film SLR bodies with their 50mm and 24mm primes?

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join for free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.