Save & earn with MPB; trade-in and buy pre-loved

The Brotherhood of the Linked Ring

dudler

Time for an update: I still use film, though. Not vast quantities, but I have a darkroom, and I'm not afraid to use it.

I enjoy every image I take: I hope you'll enjoy looking at them.
...Read More
Profile

The Brotherhood of the Linked Ring

14 Feb 2021 9:03AM   Views : 650 Unique : 470

11864_1613293391.jpg

You know those arguments about whether photography is an art or a science? They aren’t something that broke out when digital cameras started to take over, but had been going on for more than a hundred years before that: the battle lines were first drawn up in a formal way in 1892, when Henry Peach Robinson and some friends formed the Brotherhood. It has nothing to do with Saruman or Frodo, by the way.
Membership of the Brotherhood was by invitation only: and it was eight years before they invited the first sister to join: her name was Gertrude Käsebier. Ten years after the Linked Ring was founded, an American equivalent, the Photo-Secession was kicked off by Alfred Steiglitz – which prompts the question as to what it was a secession FROM. On the whole, it appears to be from stale artwork aping Victorian styles, and also from the dictatorship of entrenched institutions. Just another revolution, then.

The Photo-Secession dissolved again in short order because of Steiglitz’s autocratic tendencies: the Linked ring led to the Salon Exhibition to ‘exhibit [images] that are description of pictorial photography in which there is distinct evidence of personal feeling and execution.’

The weakness of Wikiresearch is that you can’t always dot the Ts and cross the Is: so I haven’t been able to establish for certain that the London Salon that continues (with a Covid break at present) is the direct descendant – but it’s interesting that the website states that ‘The aim of the London Salon is to exhibit only that class of photographic work in which there is distinct evidence of artistic feeling and execution.’

Now, this is where it gets confusing: in 1932, Ansel Adams helped found Group f/64 – with an anti-pictorialist aim to promote ‘pure’ photography – sharply-focussed and carefully framed images. At this stage, I’m inclined to throw my hands in the air and curse the idea that we must have names for everything – it’s like deciding that if we can name an illness, we’ve solved the problem. Until you have worked out what treatment will cure a disease, the name doesn’t matter. Similarly, being part of a photographic movement isn’t a lot of use unless it inspires you to take good pictures…

11864_1613293066.jpg

Recent blogs by dudler

Focus scales

If you’ve been taking pictures since before autofocus arrived, you’ll be very familiar with focus scales – they are one of the primary controls on an old-school camera, and just one more of the things that you really needed to get right. With autof...

Posted: 27 Dec 2022 7:01AM

Porcelain processing

People commented on the look in my last post and it seems like a good idea to share the secrets for Christmas. I learned the technique several years ago: a model’s boyfriend told me about it, and a website that described it in detail: I tried it, l...

Posted: 23 Dec 2022 10:47AM

You develop your own films don’t you?

If you have your own darkroom, or if you use film cameras regularly, there are always a few people who mention the attic. As in ‘Grandpa’s cameras are in the attic. I don’t even know if they have film in them!’ This leads me to ask if I can have a l...

Posted: 16 Aug 2022 11:17AM

Choose your pond

There’s an old saying about being a big fish and a little pond. Do you want to be the most important person in a small organisation, or are you content being a relatively small cog in a big machine? It’s the same in photography. With relatively mo...

Posted: 3 Jun 2022 2:25PM

Graduated filters

This is for Hannah, and anyone else who has come across the casual way that a lot of togs talk about one or two types of filter that landscaper photographers use a lot: graduated filters and neutral density filters. A graduated filter is one that i...

Posted: 25 Apr 2022 12:18PM

Comments

dudler Avatar
dudler Plus
20 2.1k 2048 England
14 Feb 2021 9:04AM
I feel the best answer to the question 'where do you fit in?' is either 'I don't' or 'everywhere'...

Model in the top image is That_Model_Jasmine.
James124 Avatar
James124 Plus
8 81 59 Portugal
14 Feb 2021 9:31AM
I agree. Hate that everything has to be labelled and pigeon-holed. Life and art are too complex for that.
James
whatriveristhis Avatar
14 Feb 2021 10:32AM
We're pack animals, like dogs, horses, hyenas, so there's an innate need, biologically driven, and stronger in some than in others, to 'belong.' I think that's part of it, though I think there's also a political element– "Movements" in Art are, by definition, an assault on the creative status quo.
How being a member of such a group sits with the notion of the Artist as Individual... maybe that's where it starts to get complicated...

The Poet

Therefore he no more troubled the pool of silence
But put on mask and cloak,
Strung a guitar
And moved among the folk.
Dancing they cried,
‘Ah, how our sober islands
Are gay again, since this blind lyrical tramp
Invaded the Fair!’

Under the last dead lamp
When all the dancers and masks had gone inside
His cold stare
Returned to its true task, interrogation of silence.

( George Mackay Brown )
dudler Avatar
dudler Plus
20 2.1k 2048 England
14 Feb 2021 10:47AM
That's a sad and sobering poem, Alan.
whatriveristhis Avatar
14 Feb 2021 11:00AM
I find it intense and chilling, and piercing to the bone in more ways than one.
saltireblue Avatar
saltireblue Plus
13 14.5k 88 Norway
14 Feb 2021 11:20AM
People who crave recognition will find it easiest when surrounded by like-minded souls - hence the 'need' for Salons, et al. Without that individual craving, they would not exist. Ironic, isn't it? To obtain individual recognition, we crowd together with others all seeking the same thing...

Alan, I agree. the face we put on in public is rarely the truth. It is a mere mask to hide what really exists behind it. More often than not, an emptiness...
mistere Avatar
mistere Plus
10 36 8 England
14 Feb 2021 11:23AM
Simple answer to the arguments about whether photography is an art or a science? Or anything else for that matter.
Everything is a science, unless it isn't. That's probably why philosophy was invented.Smile
dudler Avatar
dudler Plus
20 2.1k 2048 England
14 Feb 2021 12:39PM
Those characteristics too, Alan.

A lonely calling.
bluesandtwos Avatar
bluesandtwos 13 544 1 England
14 Feb 2021 12:48PM

Quote:Simple answer to the arguments about whether photography is an art or a science? Or anything else for that matter.
Everything is a science, unless it isn't. That's probably why philosophy was invented.Smile



Or, put in the laymans terms, every single thing in the entire Universe is either a duck, or not a duck.
Sorry. Blush
mistere Avatar
mistere Plus
10 36 8 England
14 Feb 2021 1:25PM

Quote:
Quote:Simple answer to the arguments about whether photography is an art or a science? Or anything else for that matter.
Everything is a science, unless it isn't. That's probably why philosophy was invented.Smile



Or, put in the laymans terms, every single thing in the entire Universe is either a duck, or not a duck.
Sorry. Blush


Correct.
pablophotographer Avatar
pablophotographer 12 2.2k 450
14 Feb 2021 5:26PM
I will paraphrase it but it is apt:

In cuckooland you can declare you are whatever you like.

philtaylorphoto Avatar
philtaylorphoto 22 334 2
14 Feb 2021 9:15PM
May I refer back to Shoury pictures?

My local picture has a 'Camera Club'. Sadly, nowadays their images are the nearest thing you will see to competent photography. It's also the home of the worst that keen amateur photographers can turn out. Birds on twigs, HDR to the max, black and white of mundane stuff overworked in Photoshop, skies with scrambled egg clouds. You get the picture.

Of course, once this becomes the house style, so that gears the club members up to to more of the same.

Of course, once any group validates something as the gold standard, there's a pile on of similar stuff.

Look at the cult of Julia Margaret Cameron. Once we had accepted focussing until the subject looked beautiful ( or as we now call it, annoyingly front focussed) it became acceptable. Ditto Peach Robinson's manipulated mawkishness.

Nope, for me, movements stifle progress.
Login

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join for free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.