Back Modifications (3)
Views: 83 (46 Unique)  Award Shortlist   


By freda
thought this was an interesting shot as each time i look at it i see something different, could i have made it better?

Tags: Architecture

Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here

This photo is here for critique. Please only comment constructively and with suggestions on how to improve it.


paulbroad 10 123 1245 United Kingdom
7 Apr 2012 8:25AM
It is interesting, but a bit confusing too. I know the area well and there are lots of interesting buildings. I think a touch less exposure to increase density and an angle to take out the chimney pots at the bottom, which do intrude without attachment.


Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

pablophotographer 6 936 334
7 Apr 2012 8:45AM
Hi.. The density of the buildings is such so I would explore more formats, like panoramic, 3:2, 1:1, and portrait shots (exploring again the formats). Your current picture takes a clear snap of the anarchy of buildings bit some on the bottom are distracted by the chimneys , like the PierInn. Didn't you shoot what was the lower part because it was hidden by the roof of the building in the foreground? I may had started the picture from the the left of that chimney on the right, turned the camera 90 degrees helping thus to include the full bell tower on the top right, even if the rest of the church is not included, a bell tower is always a land mark Wink Rotating the camera 90 degrees would also exclude the two half buildings on the bottom left. Try to locate some lines and follow them. Display a clear point of focus. If you find yourself on the same point, experiment again.
NDODS 7 5.1k 125 United Kingdom
7 Apr 2012 9:29AM
I will most certainly agree with the comments above, but I really admire this image for what it is 'Whitby', a place very close to my heart.

Regards Nathan
pamelajean Plus
12 1.1k 2016 United Kingdom
7 Apr 2012 4:32PM
This is an appealing image, Freda, and I like the natural colours you have captured, but I agree with the comments about the chimneys. I think you could have used them better, so that they became a feature of the picture. Of course, there are numerous possibilities, but if you have one prominent feature, it allows the viewer's eyes to settle upon something and then explore the rest, otherwise the eye goes around and around and settles nowhere. Alternatively, the church could have been used as one strong element, but I have to confess to not knowing Whitby, so am not sure what else is surrounding it.
I would certainly have tried a portrait/vertical format because I feel that, for a scene such as this, it tends to give the immediate impression of height.
I nearly didn't comment, for fear of repeating what had already been said, but I think the answer to your question is Yes, you could have made it better, but you have still done a grand job.
banehawi Plus
13 1.8k 3881 Canada
7 Apr 2012 6:02PM
Not knowing this place, I am reminded of painting. I will defer to the others re inclusio of the Church, etc, but one advantage of not being familiar with it, is I dont know whats missing.

So, Ive used it in the mod to apply a number of filter to it to make it appear a lot more like a rough painting, and I think it might work if you experiment with it from that perspective, rather than as a straight photo.

Its has some additional charm presented like this, at least for me. One think I did in the mod was increase the height, without increasing the width, so it will appear longer and thinner.


Steve-T 11 56 66 England
7 Apr 2012 8:23PM
I am with you. I like this type of shot - lots to look at. My first impression however is that the picture is a bit soft. When looking at your exif data I see you used f22 at 1/30 sec at 135mm. I think 1/30 may be too long for a 135mm focal length and possibly causing a slight movement and a soft shot - even with IS. The rough rule would be a shutter speed equal or greater than the focal length e.g. 1/160 - could get away with longer with the IS. This means either increasing the ISO with the prospect of increased noise or using a wider aperture. My preference would have been to use a wider aperture - perhaps f14 and slight increase in ISO (maybe 640). I think I would be comfortable that f14 or perhaps wider would still give sufficient depth of field for the scene - perhaps the more technically proficient could either reinforce this point or suggest an alternative. Hope this helps. Steve

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.