Views: 51 (5 Unique)  Award Shortlist   

Aria Force Waterfall

By JulianWells
I was trying to get a long exposure for the water but to maintain the cathedral like air of brightness. Instead I kept having difficulty with brights spots of sunlight coming through the tree canopy. I didn'y have a filter with me and I am not sure it would have solved the problem of bright spots of light and would have maybe reduced the detail on the bridge. This was more of a problem at the top of the photo as I wanted to have the bridge in the picture as well to give some sense of perspective and scale, but the sunlight washed out all the detail in the trees above the bridge and I was forced to crop them out. Be grateful for any guidance on what I should have done.

Tags: Landscape Lake district Waterfall Landscape and travel

Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INSPIRATION
  • COMMUNITY
  • COMPETITIONS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here


USA Landscape Photographer of the Year 2016 open to entries NOW!
This photo is here for critique. Please only comment constructively and with suggestions on how to improve it.

Comments


Busseauboy 9 159 France
15 Aug 2007 11:33AM
I think a much shorter exposure would have been better. It might have made the water look like real water and not shaving cream! But I do like the idea, the perspective and scale.

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

John_Frid 10 514 56 United Kingdom
15 Aug 2007 1:04PM
It is always going to be a struggle to get both the highlight and shadows correctly exposed when you have high levels of contrast.

I think you could increase the shutter speed a bit without losing the effect too much on the water. This would help control the highlights, but will result in losing some detail in the shadows.

This type of shot may be a good candidate for a blended exposure, or even an HDR image.
RosaB 9 61 2 Greece
15 Aug 2007 1:43PM

Quote:I think a much shorter exposure would have been better. It might have made the water look like real water and not shaving cream! But I do like the idea, the perspective and scale.

I agree with this comment I like to see the water in it's more natural form! Then you would have been able to get the trees in above the bridge and it would have made a better composition.
Rosalie
16 Aug 2007 5:02PM
Two shots, assuming you had a tripod, one short to freeze the water and set the background, one longer for the 'fluffy' water and then join the two together on the computer.
phil beale 13 1.5k United Kingdom
1 Sep 2007 4:43PM
With the bright sky and dark foliage you were always going to struggle to get the correct exposure for both. one method is to take two shots and then combine them in PS

personally i prefer what you have done, you still have included the bridge and given the perspective that you wanted I think a ND grad filter would have helped but you would have darkened the trees as well.

Phil
4 Sep 2007 12:12PM
Thanks for your comments. The HDR approach sounds interesting though I have never used the method before. Having looked at other HDR shots I think it may still be tricky to get the balance right and still have a realistic looking picture.

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.