Save & earn with MPB; trade-in and buy pre-loved
ADVERTISEMENT
Comments

I like the clothing she is wearing and the lighting seems to be ok.
What initially struck me was the skin texture, especially on her bare tummy and arms. For me, very overdone.
The bg looks a bit odd, did you replace or blur that ?
Would be nice to see the original before you did any post processing, you can upload it as a modification.
What initially struck me was the skin texture, especially on her bare tummy and arms. For me, very overdone.
The bg looks a bit odd, did you replace or blur that ?
Would be nice to see the original before you did any post processing, you can upload it as a modification.

As mentioned, if you still have the original before processing, it would help with feedback.
The initial impression here is that Portrait Pro has been overly strong, and applied to some areas best left alone, - her stomach for example.
Theres a thin black line just above her skirt, caused by too much blur, same issue with her camera left side, the black bangle on her arm...
With lighting, its good to have one of the units at 45 degrees vertically at the camera position approx also.
W
The initial impression here is that Portrait Pro has been overly strong, and applied to some areas best left alone, - her stomach for example.
Theres a thin black line just above her skirt, caused by too much blur, same issue with her camera left side, the black bangle on her arm...
With lighting, its good to have one of the units at 45 degrees vertically at the camera position approx also.
W

There's style and wit here, but in some aspects the processing lacks subtlety. It looks as though the subject has been isolated, I assume in order to replace or blur the background, and the result is a hard cut-out effect. It's most noticeable around the edge of her beret.
It really would be useful to see the original as a modification, and also to hear more from you as to what your intentions were in processing the image.
As I mentioned before, intrusive modification needs to be approached with great care, otherwise it becomes a distraction, it's what the viewer sees first...
Moira
It really would be useful to see the original as a modification, and also to hear more from you as to what your intentions were in processing the image.
As I mentioned before, intrusive modification needs to be approached with great care, otherwise it becomes a distraction, it's what the viewer sees first...
Moira

Again, this seems very, very heavily processed, and while the lighting works, it's probably the area to put the work in, rather than in PS or other software later on. Even lighting like this is very much what the Americans call 'Glamour 101' - more interesting and flattering results come from more subtlety and more shadow. Try one light well to one side for deep shadows - or behind for a rim lighting effect.
The model has immense style and is beautiful - everything else should be built round that.
The model has immense style and is beautiful - everything else should be built round that.

Quote:I like the clothing she is wearing and the lighting seems to be ok.
What initially struck me was the skin texture, especially on her bare tummy and arms. For me, very overdone.
The bg looks a bit odd, did you replace or blur that ?
Would be nice to see the original before you did any post processing, you can upload it as a modification.

Quote:Again, this seems very, very heavily processed, and while the lighting works, it's probably the area to put the work in, rather than in PS or other software later on. Even lighting like this is very much what the Americans call 'Glamour 101' - more interesting and flattering results come from more subtlety and more shadow. Try one light well to one side for deep shadows - or behind for a rim lighting effect.
The model has immense style and is beautiful - everything else should be built round that.