Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Connect to User

loading
29/08/2015 - 5:45 PM

Coffee at Carnaby Street

Coffee at Carnaby StreetMono works here and the conversion, whilst a few possible issues, is not far off. I would e cropping left and top to tighten p somewhat on the main figure. going slightly left of the third is no problem if it works!

Paul
28/08/2015 - 4:00 PM

Set me free

Set me freeAmusing and interestin. The crowd is the problem. Reasonably sharp and thusdistracting. Try some at full aperture, a bit frther away if possible to reduce depth of field by then zooming in, but probably not practical.

Or, go the full 70mm and just shoot upwards at his top half. That's where the picture is.

Paul
23/08/2015 - 6:35 PM

flower blossom

flower blossomYou have a good composition with nice tight crop. You need the image sharper. Not far off but nothing is truly sharp. Ideally a tripod and careful manual focusing to exactly get the flower center crisp. VR helpps get images sharper in terms of vibrations, but only helps. Never rely on it.

Paul
22/08/2015 - 3:24 PM

Kayla Sr. Pic

Kayla Sr. PicA nice outdoor portrait. I would crop much tighter to add impact otherwise it is a pleasant snapshot. Some off top, left and bottom. No problem if head goes above top right third.

The higher the ISO, the lower the quality. Same for film. Try and stay at 400 or less unless no choice. For work such as this I would try and use a tripod to allow me to move without moving the camera. Your lens is, in effect, an 80mm on that body. Thus aminimum shutter speed of 1/80 but 1/200 is better if hand holding.

All increased ISO does is increase sensor sensitivity by amplifying the basic signal. Any amplification islikely to cause a quality drop. High ISO can also increasecontrast. Hence possible burn out.

Goodstuff, just learn the camera main functions, focus, ISO, shutter speed, aperture and what they do. Then ensure a correctly exposed sharp image and you have cracked the basics of photography.

Paul
17/08/2015 - 10:28 PM

Moment

MomentAs above, but the best route would be to have the light directly behindthe woman's head, thus avoiding flare. Then as said, a little more exposure.

Paul
Cranefly sheltering from the wind and rain...Not sure about your title? The wind and rain connection ismissing for the general viewer.

This is quite good. A decent plane of sharpness if very restricted but a huge magnification. Your camera will use ISO400 and you will see no difference to all intents from 100, but you gain two stops. Thus a smaller aperture and more depth of field.


F11 would be better, oir even f16. Depth of field is everything for macro.

Paul
13/08/2015 - 4:54 PM

face

faceYou have done very well to get dcent sharpness here.. The shutter speed is very low. it is a nice image, but i would brighten things just a little with a bit extra on the eyes.

Paul
10/08/2015 - 8:01 PM

Airbourne..

Airbourne..It is a good effort of a difficult subject and the boat is coendably sharp. I do find the ovrall exposure a bit over and would darken and lift contrast. A slight top crop to reove the small very blurred boats and I would clone out the turn bouy.

I know it's part of the story in a sense, but it does intrude.

Paul
10/08/2015 - 7:55 PM

scenery

sceneryI find the long level far bank a bit off putting lacking in interesting details. The sky needs to be rather darker so burn that whole area in and crop some of the water. As John notes, the boat is cut by the far bank and would be better with water above.

Paul
07/08/2015 - 8:59 PM

Fascinated by Water

Fascinated by WaterI rather like this as presented. Well handled and presented. The figure just jars very slightly. She seems to be looking right out of the frame and it would have been better looking left.

Paul
04/08/2015 - 2:29 PM

flower vendor

flower vendorFor me, the window adds nothing. It is by far the brightest part of the imageand pulls the eye very quickly from the main subject. I would be looking at a landscape formatwith the vendor placed nearer the right for copsiinal balance.

Paul
02/08/2015 - 6:07 PM

Pipe Player from South America

Pipe Player from South AmericaAll been said. he main problemis the basic composition. He needs to be much nearer the right with the space in front of him. We canonly comment on what we can see and you wold have been very much better at a much longer focallength to fill thhe frame more with his head and also render thebackground much softer.

try and analyse the situation i the viewfinder when shooting.

Paul
02/08/2015 - 6:00 PM

STORM DAMAGE

STORM DAMAGEQuite strong but the boat blends rather with the land. a slight change of viewpoiint would crect that. A polariser will have virtually no effect with the sun in this position other than act as a weak ND filter. Polarisers are at the most effective at right angles to the sun.

Paul
28/07/2015 - 1:00 PM

Blue Bay Walk (part 2)

Blue Bay Walk (part 2)Your problem is flare. This is none image foring light scatter causing the milky effect. This can siply be bright lightgetting into the lns but it is important that the lens front eleent is clean. Dirt and grease caause flare.

Older lenses an be sources of flare. Sme lenses designed before digital sensors can flare badly due to inadequate coatings.

You do nt need to be at such high ISO. A mximum of 400 is enough with longer exposure and the camea on a tripod. The smaller the aperture chosen, f16 is small, the more you get a star effect from lights.

Paul
27/07/2015 - 6:57 PM

Guldowdi

GuldowdiI shoot a lot of macro. Macro is 1:1 or greater. Some stretch that to 1:2..

Do nt buy supplementaris. They do not get close to acro and are usually detrimental to image quality. The cheapest way to get quality is a 50m standrd lens and a set of auto tubes. they are not ideal and are slow to use, but the quality of a 50mm fixxd focal length lens is usually very good.

A full set of 3 tubes is usually a totl of 50mm. 50mm of tubes with a 50mm lens gives 1:1 on a full frame camera. greater with your Nikon, a cropped sensor.

Avoid using tubes with zoom lenses. They work but exposure calculation and magnification control is a minefield. Your choice of a Nikon opens a hge range of high qality gear as would Canon. Nikon lagged behind Canon in the early days of the digital SLR but have, at the very least, caught up.

Sony and Pentax are both good but without the huge background of equipment of the market leaders.
I would be looking at a id range focal length. you are much to close to the subject with the shorter focal lengths and whilst that is not such a problem with flowers, is not a good idea at all with insects.

I would strongly recomment thec105m Sigma EX macro. At least as good as any main anufacturers offering, a lot less expensive and superb quality. Many agazines use this lens to test ne camera bodies. That says something.

This shot. Well done with a phone. I would crop top, bottom and right to concentrate on the sharp area and move the center of the bloo to the right.

paul
17/07/2015 - 7:53 PM

Harbour Bridge

Harbour BridgeI might take a bit off top and bottoms as all the interest is across the middle. A strong well executed imagewhich works in mono. I suspect it might be even better in colour. It is pictorial record and, for me, colour then suites better.

I'm not sure it is crisply sharp? May becompression effects but such a long exposure will be prone to wind, traffic and heavy footfalo vibrations.

Paul
Lets run..Moment of joy...ChildhoodVery nice. Could possibly lift detail on the boy in some of the darker areas and I wonder if you shot a sequence. The second lad could be better placed to show more of him.

Paul
09/07/2015 - 5:30 PM

That Lonely Tree

That Lonely TreeIt is quite good. I would prefer the tree more to the left. My problem is that the tree just does not stand out from the sky. There is so much cloud break up that it's like camoflage. I think the problem is lighting.

You needed strong directional lighting, possibly late evening, with light on the tree, or a silhouette. It needs something to make the tree stand out.

Paul
08/07/2015 - 9:35 AM

Two generations

Two generationsBasically with John on the dodging and burning but you do look a little under exposed? You are using spot metering on an auto exposure mode. You do meter and lock exposure before shooting I hope?

You should not have spot set on an auto mode and just shoot as if you had partial or matrix metering set. Spot is too accurate. You must place the metering spot on the correct tone or use compensation.

An interesting image otherwise but a lot of wasted space, bottom left corner. Think I would be coming in a bit closer to fill the frame with detail.

Paul
06/07/2015 - 8:48 AM

Books Knowledge world

Books Knowledge worldGood effort. Your exposure is about right, but I would be doing a bit of dodging to brighten the figure and burning in on the foreground books. Probably a slice off each side to remove the curved stonework.

Paul