Amazon Kindle Unlimited Offer: 1-Month For FREE!
Comments
OK, you already know that there's little or nothing wrong with this technically so I'm wondering why you've offered this up for critique...
Anyway, viewed purely as a photograph and not as an architectural image of someone's home, I'd say everything about the comp is well-considered and perfectly placed - the shoes being an especially nice touch since they temper the sterility of a minimalist interior with a hint of the owner's personality. Only thing I'd take issue with is the patch of light in the top left as it does tend to draw the eye a little.
And good luck with the work, btw. It looks like you're off to a great start!
Anyway, viewed purely as a photograph and not as an architectural image of someone's home, I'd say everything about the comp is well-considered and perfectly placed - the shoes being an especially nice touch since they temper the sterility of a minimalist interior with a hint of the owner's personality. Only thing I'd take issue with is the patch of light in the top left as it does tend to draw the eye a little.
And good luck with the work, btw. It looks like you're off to a great start!
Good to see an fresh image from you Tim.
It's a lovely image alright, the light is gorgeous. I think a bit of selective tidying up of the damaged edge to the concrete on the right would have been a good move.
It's a lovely image alright, the light is gorgeous. I think a bit of selective tidying up of the damaged edge to the concrete on the right would have been a good move.
Hi Tim, good to see you partaking again.
I've always liked your work, as you know, but this is on another level; really professional, magazine quality stuff. It's no wonder you're not around here much these days, you've left us way behind!
I am going to stick my neck out and offer a little critique, nothing against the photo itself, but it says more 'product shot' to me than it does 'interior shot'. I can imagine this used in an editorial piece by a company selling the items, as opposed to illustrating the actual building or interior. Perhaps if I saw it as part of spread it would place it more in context.
I'm glad things are going well for you.
Steve
I've always liked your work, as you know, but this is on another level; really professional, magazine quality stuff. It's no wonder you're not around here much these days, you've left us way behind!
I am going to stick my neck out and offer a little critique, nothing against the photo itself, but it says more 'product shot' to me than it does 'interior shot'. I can imagine this used in an editorial piece by a company selling the items, as opposed to illustrating the actual building or interior. Perhaps if I saw it as part of spread it would place it more in context.
I'm glad things are going well for you.
Steve
This one I like, this is real class.
Composition, light, colours, spot on.
Shoes in just the right place. I'm sure they want to go out. The furniture items appear to gain their own character too.
That scruffy edge can be irritating, but I think some character may be lost if it goes - depends exactly what you're trying for.
Composition, light, colours, spot on.
Shoes in just the right place. I'm sure they want to go out. The furniture items appear to gain their own character too.
That scruffy edge can be irritating, but I think some character may be lost if it goes - depends exactly what you're trying for.
